Plate Design Test Comments

Results from the first Test Session of the three mock-up plates:

There were a number of roadblocks with the use of the utensils when in use with the plates. For example, the knife was too dull and was not able to cut easily and the fork was too flat making it hard to scoop food onto. What we took away from this is that the standard utensils need to be redesigned when integrated with the plate. The fork needs to function much like a spoon so that the food is more contained and the knife needs to be sharper in a safe way.

Other Observations:

1^st Plate – Painter’s Palette

Successful Characteristics:

- The Grip feels secure and comfortable.

- The middle ridge works well as a wall for aiding in the scooping motion.

- Cup holder works well; provides a secure hold for the cup.

Unsuccessful Characteristics:

- When setting onto the table it is difficult to release hand from the plate.

- The edges on the outside are not steep enough to scoop the food onto the fork.

2^nd Plate – Oval Plate

Successful Characteristics:

- The wave design is the best hand grip design out of the three plates for holding and putting onto the table.

- Most efficient use of plateable area.

Unsuccessful Characteristics:

- The wave design is too low that it does not function properly when using it as an aid to scoop food onto the fork.

- The cup is not deep enough to securely hold a cup while transporting the plate.

- Proportionally the eating area seems excessive.

3^rd Plate – Rectangular plate

Successful Characteristics:

- The high edge around the plate is at a sufficient height making it easy for one to scoop the food onto the fork.

Unsuccessful Characteristics:

- When held on the arm, the small size of the plate makes it hard to set onto the table

- Eating area is too small in size and too prescriptive.